Missouri’s social services agency would be prohibited from seizing Social Security benefits from foster kids under a bill that won unanimous support in the Missouri Senate Thursday. The bill, which was expanded to include numerous other foster care proposals, now goes back to the House, where it passed earlier this year. The House can send the new version directly to Gov. Mike Kehoe to be signed or vetoed. “This is a kids’ win bill,” state Sen. Jamie Burger, a Republican from Benton who sponsored the legislation, said on Tuesday. “There’s many aspects of it. There’s many senators that have been involved.” Missouri’s child welfare agency takes millions of dollars each year in foster children’s benefits and uses the money to help pay for foster care. In fiscal year 2024, Children’s Division spent over $10.6 million in children’s benefits. Over 1,200 foster kids were receiving benefits in Missouri of late last year, or just over 10% of all kids in care. As a result, kids who are orphaned or have disabilities are responsible for paying toward the cost of their care in state custody. The bill, which was also sponsored by state Rep. Melissa Schmidt, a Republican from Eldridge, would ban the state from using those benefits to pay itself back for routine foster care expenses. Instead, the division could use the funds for the child’s “unmet needs” beyond what the division is obligated to pay, such as housing as the child prepares to age out of foster care. It’s long been a common practice nationally to take foster kids’ benefits, but it’s come under increased scrutiny over the last few years. Several states, including Arizona , New Mexico and Oregon , have halted the practice. The effort to ban the practice won bipartisan support during last year’s session and was on the precipice of passing. But it died when GOP infighting forced the state Senate to adjourn early. House Speaker Jon Patterson pledged earlier this year that this legislation would be the first bill sent to the Senate, highlighting the issue as legislation that “should have been passed but fell victim to our inaction and politics.”
CONTINUE READING